SCOUG Logo


Next Meeting: Sat, TBD
Meeting Directions


Be a Member
Join SCOUG

Navigation:


Help with Searching

20 Most Recent Documents
Search Archives
Index by date, title, author, category.


Features:

Mr. Know-It-All
Ink
Download!










SCOUG:

Home

Email Lists

SIGs (Internet, General Interest, Programming, Network, more..)

Online Chats

Business

Past Presentations

Credits

Submissions

Contact SCOUG

Copyright SCOUG



warp expowest
Pictures from Sept. 1999

The views expressed in articles on this site are those of their authors.

warptech
SCOUG was there!


Copyright 1998-2024, Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.

The Southern California OS/2 User Group
USA

SCOUG-SundialSIG Mailing List Archives

Return to [ 18 | May | 2001 ]

<< Previous Message <<


Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 23:45:46 PDT
From: John Hlavac <jhlavac@flash.net >
Reply-To: scoug-sundialsig@scoug.com
To: scoug-sundialsig@scoug.com
Subject: SCOUG-SundialSIG: Initial Offering

Content Type: text/plain

Peter-

I know I uploaded the spreadsheet with NO explanation, but the intention
was to have it be a >summary< of a person's assets done on, say, a
quarterly basis. That's why I tried to get all the information on just
one sheet. Now as time goes on the right side of the spreadsheet just
grows. But it was never the intention to _print_ the entire worksheet.
Just the most recent information. That's why the most recent quarter is
right next to the account number. To put a new quarter in place, you
have to insert a new column and everything else move over one. That's
why all the % formulas are in the form {=RATE(1,-1*$I$4,$L$4} with
absolute cell addresses. In retrospect, the dollar sign before the row
appellation should be relative rather than absolute. Thus:
=RATE(1,-1*$I4,$L4) would be more correct. (That way you could add rows
too).

Printing would be only of the more recent data.

For example, let's say I live for another 25 years. That's just another
100 columns. Clearly unprintable, even at 6 point type and very wide
paper. The hope is that you can print just columns A-M, U, & AC.

I just tried to do this and the results were less than stellar. A-M is
okay, but then the next two disparate columns print one to a page. I'm
sure that this is a problem with me, rather than Mesa/2.

The contribution correction idea of yours is a different can-o-worms. Of
course it is the way to go. I don't know if it should show on the main
sheet or get placed on another page. My intention was to make an easy to
read summary page of investments. Adding additional columns of
contributions could double (or triple) the size of the spreadsheet and
would run the risk of burying the overview information in the details.
(You can't tell the forest for the trees).

What do you think? Any suggestions?

Peter Skye wrote:
>
> Good spreadsheet. Can I make a suggestion? Can you split the
> information into two parts, so the % return info (the left-side columns)
> is on one page and the $ detail info is on a separate page (with dates
> going down, not across)? It will be easier to add more displays if you
> do this (and will also be easier to print).
>
> > Right off the bat there's a problem. The Roth IRA has
> > a fairly common problem. Each year's contribution
> > gets wrapped into the interest increase. How does
> > one deal with continuing contributions to a fund?
>
> You need to also post to the spreadsheet what the contribution amount is
> and the date it is made. Then it's possible to back out the
> contributions and "approximately" determine the true % return. (You
> can't determine an "absolute" true % return because you don't know the
> value of the account on the date that the contribution is made. If you
> _do_ know the account value on the contribution date, then you _can_
> calculate the "absolute" true % return.)
>
> Suppose you're calculating the 5YEAR%. Start five years ago and
> calculate as-best-you-can the account value on the date of your next
> contribution, then calculate the rate of return for just that time
> period. Calculate the rates of return for all other time periods as
> well ("time period" being the time periods between your contributions).
> You can now compound the individual rates of return into one overall
> rate of return (this is easy if each time period is the same number of
> days, more complex if the time periods have different numbers of days).
>
> - Peter
>
> =====================================================
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
> to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
> put the command "unsubscribe scoug-sundialsig".
>
> For problems, contact the list owner at
> "rollin@scoug.com".
>
> =====================================================

=====================================================

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-sundialsig".

For problems, contact the list owner at
"rollin@scoug.com".

=====================================================


<< Previous Message <<

Return to [ 18 | May | 2001 ]



The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA

Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.