said:
>You missed my point. The delay kicks in between 1.8b1 and 1.0a.
I see. I did not understand your post to say this.
> do
>not have anything between those so that is as close as I can get. It is
>the same on 1.5a - 29 Jan 06.
I suspect you mean 1.0?
>And I am saying that in my case hardware does effect the delay time. It
>is more noticeable on a slow machine than a faster one.
Regardless. A 10 second delay between messages is excessive on almost any
system.
You might want to try Peter's Seamonkey build and see if it too has the
problem you are observing.
Steven
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Steven Levine" MR2/ICE 2.67 #10183 Warp/eCS/DIY/14.103a_W4
www.scoug.com irc.fyrelizard.com #scoug (Wed 7pm PST)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
=====================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".
For problems, contact the list owner at
"postmaster@scoug.com".
=====================================================
<< Previous Message <<
>> Next Message >>
Return to [ 04 |
April |
2006 ]
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.