said:
>
> >Hmmm. That's what went on from my 1.2 install CDs.
>
> >Strikes me a bit odd that they would use a testcase
> >kernel for the GA release . . . unless time had
> >passed, it had accumulated a track record, and they
> >had a lot of confidence in it.
> Some days I wonder about you more than others.
And why would that be ? YOU said this (100c)is a
Testcase kernel. It IS what the install CDs put on my
system for 1.2, and I have made no kernel changes
after that. Testcase kernels are usually only up for
a few days -- i.e., for testing purposes, related to
some specific issue. One would not expect to find
anything other than a rock solid kernel that Serenity
had real confidence in as the kernel of the GA
release. So where is the flaw in my conclusion ?
Jordan
=====================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".
For problems, contact the list owner at
"postmaster@scoug.com".
=====================================================
<< Previous Message <<
>> Next Message >>
Return to [ 04 |
July |
2005 ]
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.