SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives
Return to [ 08 | 
May | 
2004 ]
<< Previous Message << 
 >> Next Message >>
 
 
 
Content Type:   text/plain 
=====================================================  
If you are responding to someone asking for help who  
may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the  
REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.  
=====================================================  
 
On Sat, 8 May 2004 00:39:30 PDT7, Steve Schiffman wrote:  
 
>> I did as suggested -- in fact, had determined that I would do so before your  
>> note arrived -- and I now have a functioning peer network running OS/2.   
>  
>Good. Now we can work on figuring out why the Linksys PCcard is not working.  
 
Yeah, I'm a lot happier camper now that things are communicating at 10BaseT  
speeds.  Of course, the original goal was to get things running at 100BaseTX  
speeds and that remains the ultimate objective.  
 
>Your lan cable is probably not the problem. You have the latest and   
>greatest, and if it was sold as a lan cable, it is has the correct   
>standard, particularly since it lists the cable as CAT5e. But just in case   
>the new cable has a bad connector termination, try using the previous lan   
>cable you were using. The previous cable should work just fine.  
>  
>I just re-read your post (first paragraph above) and unless you changed   
>the lan cable from the new cable to the previous one when you re-installed   
>the EtherJet PC card, the new cable is just fine.  
 
Well, there is an issue with this.  The Linksys card has a dongle that accepts  
one end of a standard cable.  The new cable is plugged into the dongle on one  
end and into the hub at the other end.  The IBM EtherJet card interfaces to a  
special plug which incorporates a very thin, very flexible ethernet cable which  
has a standard plug on the other end.  That end is plugged into the hub.  So, I  
can't really compare operation of the cable with the two cards.  
 
If push comes to shove, I'll buy a new Linksys LNE100TX card for the desktop  
system.  During boot, the driver reports that it can drive either a LNEPCI or  
LNE100TX card.  I believe (I haven't looked in several years) that I'm running  
an LNEPCI card.  The change wouldn't be very expensive; it would achieve the  
desired objective, but it wouldn't actually solve the problem we are trying to  
address.  
 
Thanks for your help, so far.  
 
 
 
--gary  
=====================  
ggranat@earthlink.net  
 
 
=====================================================  
 
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message  
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,  
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".  
 
For problems, contact the list owner at  
"rollin@scoug.com".  
 
=====================================================  
 
  
<< Previous Message << 
 >> Next Message >>
Return to [ 08 | 
May | 
2004 ] 
  
  
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
 P.O. Box 26904
 Santa Ana, CA  92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group.  ALL RIGHTS 
RESERVED. 
 
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International 
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.
 
 |