SCOUG Logo


Next Meeting: Sat, TBD
Meeting Directions


Be a Member
Join SCOUG

Navigation:


Help with Searching

20 Most Recent Documents
Search Archives
Index by date, title, author, category.


Features:

Mr. Know-It-All
Ink
Download!










SCOUG:

Home

Email Lists

SIGs (Internet, General Interest, Programming, Network, more..)

Online Chats

Business

Past Presentations

Credits

Submissions

Contact SCOUG

Copyright SCOUG



warp expowest
Pictures from Sept. 1999

The views expressed in articles on this site are those of their authors.

warptech
SCOUG was there!


Copyright 1998-2024, Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.

The Southern California OS/2 User Group
USA

SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives

Return to [ 01 | June | 2004 ]

<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>


Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 21:39:34 PDT7
From: "J. R. Fox" <jr_fox@pacbell.net >
Reply-To: scoug-help@scoug.com
To: scoug-help@scoug.com
Subject: SCOUG-Help: Re: Audio recording / editing programs?

Content Type: text/plain

=====================================================
If you are responding to someone asking for help who
may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the
REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.
=====================================================

Peter Skye wrote:

> We used some pretty advanced electronics in the studios when we had to
> clean up old records for the shows. We used de-clickers, de-essers,
> noise gates, eq-expansion, differential attack gates and probably other
> stuff I've forgotten about. I built some of the boxes we used. But in
> most cases the song sounded *better* when it hadn't been processed
> because there's not much difference between the attack of an electric
> guitar or close-mic'd piano and the attack of a click or pop, and the
> equipment made everything sound "soft" while it was taking out the
> sounds we didn't want. If you play your newly-transferred tunes for a
> while and still want them processed you can always do the processing
> later.

Uh-huh, the baby along with the bathwater syndrome. I recall that being the
audiophile consensus, back when Carver and others were building various
super-techno processor boxes. Maybe one or another of these things was smart
enough to distinguish between an objectionable type of noise and what might
actually be musical information, but if so it never came to my attention.

I'll tell you something else: though there has been a great deal of progress
made with the digital music chain (which by now rules the musical universe),
I still think that there is plenty of analog music (on LPs, maybe on
reel-to-reel) that -- if played back on great equipment -- *still* sounds
much better musically than almost any cd, *even with* some noise being
present on the former. Some important information and true-to-life
subtleties get lost when you sample, go over to those 1s & 0s, and take out
all the noise imperfections !

Jordan

=====================================================

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".

For problems, contact the list owner at
"rollin@scoug.com".

=====================================================


<< Previous Message << >> Next Message >>

Return to [ 01 | June | 2004 ]



The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA

Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group. OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation. All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.