SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives
Return to [ 23 |
January |
2004 ]
<< Previous Message <<
>> Next Message >>
Content Type: text/plain
=====================================================
If you are responding to someone asking for help who
may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the
REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.
=====================================================
Hi Steven
Thanks for your suggestion ;-)
I see a difference ;-))
Since my OS2.KEY has undergone a massive extension with some more
entries =
I never had the problem of an incomplete archive restore from the WPS
owned =
feature !
Following your answer I will have to look better into UniMaint's DT
Backup and =
Restore !!
BTW: At this time I would like to remind:
On Jan 9th, 2004 I have asked and written about my problems with
ARCinst on =
my notebook with MCP 4.52 !!!
I am doing a very regular archive of my WPS and once in a month,
normally =
after the montly system backup, I do an ARCinst followed by one or two
normal =
archive run(s).
All these years I never had problems running ARCinst and getting a
renewed =
0X generation with an emptied 1 to 3 generation display.
After running one or a second WPS archive all archive generations were =
displayed again.
Now on this notebook the displaying date does not change anymore
however =
how many ARCinst I am doing ;-(((
Where do I need to change or switch to get it working properly ?
Thanks in advance for assistnace and guidance !
Regards, svobi
=
steve53@earthlink.net on 23/01/2004 19:14:49
Please respond to scoug-help@scoug.com
To: scoug-help@scoug.com
cc: =
Subject: SCOUG-Help: Unimaint
In <1074883460-0-i-lists@synass.net>, on 01/23/04 =
at 09:19 AM, "i-lists" said:
>Myself I dod not switch over to using Unimaint's backup tools ! I am
>doing a very frequent archive with the WPS archive !!
>Do I miss something important doing so ???
If you have never had an archive restore fail, you are not missing
anything other than a bit of wasted time. Unimaint's backup runs faster
and runs with the the system up and running. I have seen too many
systems
where the builtin Desktop resore fails to restore correctly. Depending
on
the individual situation, the result is either a full restore, a
non-destructive makeini, a destructive makeini or a full reinstall. =
None
of these are things that would rate high on the scale of things I enjoy.
Regards, Steven
************************************************
>>> Say NO to H T M L in Mail and News <<<
>>> A G A I N S T T E R R O R & W A R <<<
************************************************=
=====================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".
For problems, contact the list owner at
"rollin@scoug.com".
=====================================================
<< Previous Message <<
>> Next Message >>
Return to [ 23 |
January |
2004 ]
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.
|