said: 
>8mb. is pretty antideluvian and threadbare.  32mb. of onboard video 
>memory has been a standard baseline for many years, and of course the 
>cards being sold today go up to 256mb. or more.  (O.K., I know the over 
>64mb. ones are of most use to Win-gamers . . . . ) 
The extra memory is useful, regardless of what Peter says.  Smart drivers 
cache more than just the sprites.  The real difference is the time it 
takes to get the screen content from CPU RAM to video RAM.  Given the 
resolution Peter running and the CPU speed, one can watch the windows 
paint pixel row by pixel row.  Of course this does not matter if most of 
what you use the screen for is to display VIO windows with a black 
background. 
IAC, the video redraw time is a minimal percentage of what is causing the 
25 minute load time.  It's CPU activity that occurs when Mozilla reads in 
the page and builds the internal representation that make up the bulk of 
the time.  Part of the extra load time, when compared to Netscape, is 
expected.  Mozilla does more than Netscape where more is the result of 
things like configurability, standards support and generally better page 
rendering.  These all have a computational cost. 
Even so, there's something else going on that causing the load time to 
degenerate far beyond what one would typically expect.  It could be 
something like an internal table that is using a linear lookup rather than 
a hash.  A linear lookup might be the optimal design for pages in the 
normal size range, but Peter's page is far outside what would be 
considered a normal html page. 
This is similar to the problems one encounters when one tries to use a 
word processor to edit binary data.  Word processors are designed to 
optimally handle lines of average width.  They all degrade in one way or 
another with given binary data with no line endings. 
The programmers editor is use is better than most.  I claims: 
 o File sizes, number of open files, line length, and number of  
   windows constrained only by system limitations.  
It does get a bit sluggish when I push the line length into the millions 
of characters. 
Regards, 
Steven 
--  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
"Steven Levine"   MR2/ICE 2.47 #10183 Warp4/FP15/14.093c_W4 
www.scoug.com irc.fyrelizard.com #scoug (Wed 7pm PST) 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
===================================================== 
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message 
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message, 
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help". 
For problems, contact the list owner at 
"rollin@scoug.com". 
===================================================== 
<< Previous Message << 
 >> Next Message >>
Return to [ 31 | 
August | 
2004 ]
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA  92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group.  ALL RIGHTS 
RESERVED. 
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International 
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.