SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives
Return to [ 30 | 
September | 
2003 ]
<< Previous Message << 
 >> Next Message >>
 
 
 
Content Type:   text/plain 
=====================================================  
If you are responding to someone asking for help who  
may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the  
REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.  
=====================================================  
 
On 9/30/03, Peter Skye wrote, in part:  
>> >Your old timestamp is still in the header  
>> > -- take a look and you'll see it.  
>>   
>> It's kinda neat to see how far off SOME people's  
>> clocks are!  Mine gains 2.5 seconds/day!  
>  
>Computer clock chips aren't as accurate as some might think.    
>I have one machine that gains almost two minutes per day.  
>  
>You should be running a Network Time Protocol (NTP) client   
>on your machine to keep the clock accurate.    
>(Steve, I thought you were running TIME868.)    
 
I run TIME686 automatically every time I boot the machine.    
Since I shut down at least every night, the clock is always   
pretty close, within a few seconds seems close enough for   
timestamps.  The wife's windows machine gains 2.5+ seconds/day.   
The OS/2 machine is better, <1 second/day.   
 
I figure near-monotonic time is good enough for what I need.    
And I really Like Norbert Dey's TIME868 program, even though   
the last release was since Dec '96.   
 
> My favorite is OS2NTPD because it keeps my clock more  
>accurate than any of the others.  For some reason it's never been  
>uploaded to Hobbes but you can get it from the European equivalent LEO:  
>  
>  http://ftp.leo.org/pub/comp/os/os2/leo/tcpip/systools/os2ntp12.zip  
>  
>I believe eCS comes with one.  Personally I like the  
>constantly-synchronized approach of OS2NTPD rather than the  
>occasionally-synchronized approach of the others.  Don't forget to use a  
>separate non-PM NTP program (I use DAYTIME) to initially set the clock  
>on bootup from your startup.cmd file (*not* your Startup folder) or from  
>your CONFIG.SYS file.  >- Peter  
 
What is the significance of using startup.cmd as opposed to the startup   
folder, aside from running earlier in the boot-up process?   
 
Am I missing something I should be considering?    
 
 --Steve  
 
 
 
=====================================================  
 
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message  
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,  
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".  
 
For problems, contact the list owner at  
"rollin@scoug.com".  
 
=====================================================  
 
  
<< Previous Message << 
 >> Next Message >>
Return to [ 30 | 
September | 
2003 ] 
  
  
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
 P.O. Box 26904
 Santa Ana, CA  92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group.  ALL RIGHTS 
RESERVED. 
 
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International 
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.
 
 |