SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives
Return to [ 04 | 
June | 
2003 ]
<< Previous Message << 
 >> Next Message >>
 
 
 
Content Type:   text/plain 
=====================================================  
If you are responding to someone asking for help who  
may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the  
REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.  
=====================================================  
 
On 6/4/03, J. R. Fox wrote, in part:  
>Steve wrote:  
>> ... Soon, 8MB caches will be standard.  
>  
>Are they only available on the larger HDs ?  I'm also wondering  
>what may have happened vis-a-vis the 15K/rpm drives.  Even if  
>they did offer a noticeable improvement ...   
 
8MB HW caches are available only on the NEWER drive models, which   
makes them larger by default.  Even there, IBM is offering them on   
the largest of the newer models. A BIG advantage I did _NOT_ mention,   
is that the 8MB cache models still have the 3-year warranty (!!),   
whereas the now-obsolescent 2MB models have fallen back, along   
with the rest of the industry, to 1-year.  That alone makes it   
easy to justify the 8MB model for just a few $ more.   
 
For me, it's too soon for me to arrive at any conclusion about 15Krpm   
drives.  Besides, they're way too pricey for a cheap b*st*rd like me.   
 
>> ... the  
>> largest possible HPFS software cache is 2MB -- small by today's  
>> standards. [HPFS 386 does allow up to 64MB I've read].  
>  
>If OS/2 can't make use of the larger cache size (last time I checked,  
>HPFS 386 still cost a bundle, and there can't be many end-users  
>running it), this won't ever benefit us, except while booted into  
>another OS.     >Jordan  
 
Oops, I meant to indicate the the 2MB maximum was the SW cache size   
in the HPFS driver, not the HW cache on the HD.  The HW cache on the   
drive is usable by whatever talks to it.   
 
HPFS 386 was once available on Hobbes.  May still be. I don't know how   
to apply it, but the file had directions and it was NOT difficult to   
switch back and forth, as I recall. Perhaps it could be extracted from   
a copy of WseB.    
 
It's an interesting commentary on changing times, but HW caches on   
hard drives have now gotten larger than the SW cache in (our favorite)   
operation system.   
 
 --Steve  
 
 
 
=====================================================  
 
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message  
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,  
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".  
 
For problems, contact the list owner at  
"rollin@scoug.com".  
 
=====================================================  
 
  
<< Previous Message << 
 >> Next Message >>
Return to [ 04 | 
June | 
2003 ] 
  
  
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
 P.O. Box 26904
 Santa Ana, CA  92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group.  ALL RIGHTS 
RESERVED. 
 
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International 
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.
 
 |