said:
>More than 256 MB on a 386? Neat! You'll have to show me one of those.
>More than 256 MB on a 486? Neat! You'll have to show me one of those.
There you go again. Off, off and away. I was not referring to a specific
address where caching would no longer occur just that it would no longer
occur. Maybe I've been lucky, I've never had a Pentium based MB that was
unable to cache the entire memory range. I have had 486's with this
limitation.
>Only 256 KB on yours? Ahahahahahahaha!!! The 360 mod 50 at Washington
>University in St. Louis had a little over 2 MB.
We were a poor engineering department. What can I say? I spent much of
my time crashing it while developing I/O channel control firmware for
directly attached 3270's.
Steven
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
"Steven Levine" MR2/ICE 2.30a #10183 Warp4/FP15
www.scoug.com irc.webbnet.org #scoug (Wed 7pm PST)
----------------------------------------------------------------
=====================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".
For problems, contact the list owner at
"rollin@scoug.com".
=====================================================
<< Previous Message <<
>> Next Message >>
Return to [ 16 |
January |
2002 ]
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA 92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.